|
Post by Owen Williams on Dec 10, 2005 20:02:05 GMT -5
OOC: Yeah but who are we to pay attention to rules? I reckon stop voting and we get some amendments to address some of the points raised by O'Shea and Shackleton.
|
|
|
Post by Rick Warder on Dec 10, 2005 20:43:18 GMT -5
DEBATE is resumed. Fiat! Have at it guys, my mistake - honestly, no need to be rules sticklers. E.
|
|
|
Post by Admin Tyler on Dec 13, 2005 19:05:37 GMT -5
"Are you ready for the question or are we going to see some amendments soon?"
|
|
|
Post by Owen Williams on Dec 13, 2005 23:29:54 GMT -5
I move to amend Section 1 by inserting the word "knowingly" between the word "who" and "sells"
|
|
|
Post by Admin Tyler on Dec 13, 2005 23:40:30 GMT -5
Amended.
|
|
|
Post by Owen Williams on Dec 14, 2005 1:54:01 GMT -5
I now move to call the question
|
|
|
Post by Cody Shea on Dec 14, 2005 5:00:57 GMT -5
"I move to amend section 1 to replace 'person' with 'business establishment', strike the Class A misdemeanor charge, and increase the fine to $20,000."
|
|
|
Post by Owen Williams on Dec 14, 2005 5:51:43 GMT -5
I second the amendment of the gentleman from South Carolina (that's right isn't it?)
|
|
|
Post by Cody Shea on Dec 14, 2005 11:10:47 GMT -5
(OOC: North)
|
|
|
Post by Admin Tyler on Dec 14, 2005 15:07:27 GMT -5
Amended.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Sterling on Dec 15, 2005 16:53:41 GMT -5
Nay
|
|
|
Post by Admin Tyler on Dec 18, 2005 17:25:55 GMT -5
"Is the gentleman ready for the question?"
|
|
|
Post by Rick Warder on Dec 19, 2005 14:35:21 GMT -5
(OOC: Dan Sterling, nay on what? *grin*)
|
|
|
Post by Uxbridge on Dec 20, 2005 14:55:11 GMT -5
Nay
|
|
|
Post by Owen Williams on Dec 20, 2005 18:36:58 GMT -5
Nay
OOC: We need to make amendments
|
|